Choose an essay cited by Bekkers and Wiepking in their review and explain in greater depth how this article helps to explain a particular motivation to give.
The purpose of this assignment is to see the range of incentives for giving
and how those incentives manifest. 

Find the essay using the library resources and analyze it.  In your post (350-600 words) you should do the following.

List the full citation.
Describe the goal of the research design. What did the author set out to test?
Describe the methods. Was it a survey, descriptive work, lab or field study?
Describe the results. What was significant?  Were there secondary results?  Were these also discussed in the literature review by Bekkers and Wiepking?
Did Bekkers and Wiepking leave out any important points from the text?

(I study nonprofit management as an international student from China.
I choose the
Immigration and citizenship status topic in Bekkers, R. and Wiepking, P. (2007)(1). Generosity and Philanthropy, A Literature Review,.pdf ,

make sure you take a look at the PDF doc first and search the text below:
Immigration and citizenship status
Osili and Du (2005) found that immigrants in the United States are less likely to give
to charitable organizations and also give less, but that these differences are due to differences
in racial background, lower levels of income, and education. Wong, Lien and Conway (2005)
find that immigrants (especially foreign-born non US citizens) are less likely to donate money
to political parties than US born citizens. Frey and Meier (2004a; 2005) find that immigrant
students are less likely to donate to social funds of their university than native students.
Individuals born in a non-English speaking country give less often and lower amounts in
Australia (Lyons & Nivison-Smith 2006). Mean amounts donated by foreign born and
Canadian born citizens do not seem to differ (Mata & McRae 2000) though contributions
increase with the number of years residing in the country. Osili and Du (2005) find that the
gap between immigrants and native citizens closes as time spent in the US increases. They
also find that immigrants spend more on informal donations to family members often in
their country of origin (remittances) than native Americans. While informal donations
among native Americans also exceed formal donations (Schervish & Havens 2002), this gap
appears to be wider among immigrants. Brown and Ferris (2007) find that US citizens give
more to religion than immigrants, controlling for memberships and trust.

the article I choose is Osili and Du (2005) which I have upload -Immigrant assimilation and charitable giving

use this article to do the Article Post.
Choose an essay cited by Bekkers and Wiepking in their review and explain in greater depth how this article helps to explain a particular motivation to give.
The purpose of this assignment is to see the range of incentives for giving
and how those incentives manifest.  Students will be asked to post this assignment to the Canvas course site. [L1, L3]

Find the essay using the library resources and analyze it.  In your post (350-600 words) you should do the following.

List the full citation.
Describe the goal of the research design. What did the author set out to test?
Describe the methods. Was it a survey, descriptive work, lab or field study?
Describe the results. What was significant?  Were there secondary results?  Were these also discussed in the literature review by Bekkers and Wiepking?
Did Bekkers and Wiepking leave out any important points from the text?