icon

UseTopicwritingscode to get 5% OFF on your first order!

(Full topic in instructions, too long) Has to do with CH.2 of Moral Nexus and what Wallace means as well as defending position

Wallace claims in Chapter 2 of The Moral Nexus that moral obligations appear as presumptive constraintson an agents deliberation. He also claims that the relational approach to morality captures that deonticaspect of moral obligation.What does Wallace mean by such claims? What support does he provide for them? On you view, doesWallaces relational approach provide a more illuminating picture of the deontic structure of moral obligation than the divine command theory does? Why / Why not? Defend your answer.

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes